The most recognized challenge
to organizations, business or non-profit, is crisis. Crisis, a critical
time for change and decision, has turned to be the dominant concern
in management everywhere since September 11, 2001.
Our confidence on our crisis solution system comes from two sources:
the methodology we are using in constructing the solution; and
the feedback from our customers.
Our system represents a continuing efforts to integrate relevant
concepts and practices in the field, to provide practical guidelines
and procedures, to synchronize the operational values of efficiency
and crisis prevention, to evolve with the scientific findings
and practical know-how.
Instead of transaction
efficiency only, crisis leadership uplifts the
target towards: a continuing renewal to a higher and meaningful
being.
Crisis leadership takes
no dichotomy between crisis and efficiency, but a dialectic one
inherent with a mechanism of self-generated renewal force. read
more..
Crisis demands turnaround changes; management
tunes itself up for containing emergent incidents.
Crisis aims to end the existing order and demands fundamental
changes; management obliges to maintain the order and
to protect its clock-like rules.
Crisis asks for transformation; management clings
on transactional efficiency.
Crisis presents normality tomorrow in today’s form of deviation;
management insists on narrowing the variances and driving out abnormality.
Crisis follows a rule of chaotic self-organization,
while management optimizes the system in a form of automation. read more..